AmarnepalNepal Data
Eight-thousanders compared

Kanchenjunga vs Makalu

Kanchenjunga (8,586 m, world #3) and Makalu (8,485 m, world #5) compared side by side — height, first ascent and danger. Kanchenjunga is 101 m taller.

KanchenjungaMakalu
Height8,586 m8,485 m
World rank#3#5
RangeKangchenjunga HimalMahalangur Himal (Makalu section)
LocationTaplejung, KoshiSankhuwasabha, Koshi
BorderNepal–India (Sikkim) borderNepal–China (Tibet) border
First ascent25 May 195515 May 1955
First climbersGeorge Band & Joe Brown (UK); Norman Hardie & Tony Streather the next dayJean Couzy & Lionel Terray (France)
Standard routeSouthwest Face (Yalung side, Nepal)Northwest Ridge (French route)
DangerHistorically among the deadlier 8000ers; Himalayan Database-derived estimates put the fatality rate near 9–12% of summits (compilations ≈2024).≈390 summits and ≈40 deaths by ≈2019 — among the harder classic 8000ers (Himalayan Database-derived compilations).
Questions

Kanchenjunga vs Makalu, answered

Is Kanchenjunga taller than Makalu?+

Kanchenjunga stands 8,586 m and Makalu 8,485 m, so Kanchenjunga is 101 m taller. Kanchenjunga is the world's 3th-highest mountain and Makalu the 5th.

Which was climbed first, Kanchenjunga or Makalu?+

Kanchenjunga was first summited on 25 May 1955; Makalu on 15 May 1955.

Which is more dangerous, Kanchenjunga or Makalu?+

Kanchenjunga: Historically among the deadlier 8000ers; Himalayan Database-derived estimates put the fatality rate near 9–12% of summits (compilations ≈2024). Makalu: ≈390 summits and ≈40 deaths by ≈2019 — among the harder classic 8000ers (Himalayan Database-derived compilations).

More comparisons

← Compare all eight-thousanders

Sources & data note

Heights follow the 2020 Nepal–China Everest survey and UIAA figures. Ascent and fatality statistics derive from the Himalayan Database (via Alan Arnette, 2026) and reported press figures; see each peak's profile for full sourcing.